Showing posts with label NSA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NSA. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

The Real State of the Union

The Real State of the Union


President Obama gave his 7th State of the Union speech  last night, January 21st 2015. After hearing these speeches year after year, president after president I have come to see them not as projections of what the actual state of the nation is, but rather an advertisement for things the president thinks he did well,
“ ...more of our people are insured than ever before...”

Well yeah, they kind of have to be, remember you made them criminals if they didn’t buy insurance.

Not mentioned in last nights remarks is the reality of the real state of the union.

What about the National Debt?
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 21 Jan 2015 at 06:03:20 PM GMT is:
$ 1 8 , 0 9 2 , 4 1 9 , 3 8 6 , 5 7 5 . 9 4
The estimated population of the United States is 319,850,520
so each citizen's share of this debt is $56,565.23.
The National Debt has continued to increase an average of
$2.40 billion per day since September 30, 2012!


Or maybe the amount of new regulations?

A little over 75,000 pages of new burdensome and restrictive regulations were imposed on US businesses. Each one a hinderance to the growth and expansion of businesses.

No mention of the prison population.
More than 1.57 million inmates sat behind bars in federal, state, and county prisons and jails around the country as of December 31, 2013. Many from victimless crimes.

We could go on with the rising tax rates, poverty levels, inflation, wasteful spending, the drug war, real wars and their destructive nature, the rate of returning soldiers committing suicide, the rate of bankruptcy and homelessness, the NSA…. And so on and so on.

The State of the Union has become nothing more than promises of future action and commercialization of past actions, not to give a statistical breakdown of how the nation is functioning.

Thursday, September 11, 2014

The costs of post 9/11

Today is 9/11/ 2014, 13 years since the greatest attack on American citizens since the country's formation. Under President Bush he used the events of the day to not only wage a Global War on an Obscure Definition of Terror but also to give this day a new name of remembrance. Patriot Day as it is now called has moved from a somber remembrance of events to debate and confusion, statism and a subjective view of what constitutes Patriotism.

What have we lost?

9/11/2001 around 3,000 people lost their lives in the World Trade Center buildings and the flights used as guided missiles. In the aftermath of the buildings collapsing, the total deaths were recorded at 2,996 people, including the 19 hijackers and 2,977 victims. More would succumb to illness caused by the dust and debris in the months and years afterwards, and we can only speculate on those citizens who died as a result of shock at the unfolding of the atrocities of the day. But these are not the only casualties we can add to this. we can also add in the deaths of service members and civilians from America and those of other nations.

According to the website Journalist's Resource "The Brown University project estimated that together, all countries involved have lost a total of 31,000 uniformed servicemembers and military contractors. In addition, the researchers estimated in 2011 that between 152,280 and 192,550 civilians in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan have died as a “result of the fighting at the hands of all parties.” In March 2013, the Brown researchers revised the civilian total estimate to 200,000; and they estimated that 330,000 people had been killed overall as a result of the conflicts, accounting for all soldiers, militants, police, contractors, journalists, humanitarian workers and civilians involved."

These numbers should do enough to discourage any more operations in the areas, but sadly it does not deter those war hawkish members of the political atmosphere nor a number of citizens from the demolition and destruction of these countries, these people and these futures. 

Lives cost a lot, no one is denying that, but let's take a second to look at the economical impact the past 13 years have taken. According to the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) Total spent and obligated through FY 2014 is around 4,374.5 billion US dollars. (2014 dollars) with the Additional Cumulative Interest on Past Pentagon and State/USAID War Appropriations FY 2001‐2013 by 2054 reaching over 7,900 billion. If you are having trouble with converting that, it is 4 Trillion 374 Billion, 500 Million dollars since 2001 and an estimated 7 Trillion 900 Billion dollars. 

All of this is taken directly from increased borrowing from the US Central Bank with loans being paid back with interest by the US taxpayer. That money is being created with the future payments being ladled with interest and being sworn to your children and grand-children and so on. 

Another aspect of what has been lost since 2001.

The rights and privacy lost since 2001 have been explained by many, from Judge Andrew Napolitano to Former House Of Representative and 2008 and 2012 Presidential candidate Ron Paul, from the leaked document of the CIA, NSA, DOJ, DOD and a host of other alphabet soup agencies by the work of Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and Julian Assange, who took personal sacrifice for the American citizens to a new level. 

All the new security you see and experience when traveling, paid for by increased taxation. All the new background checks you go through, paid for by increased taxation. The departments themselves, who have been the subject to their own leaks of inter-office behavior, are entirely funded by the same ones they are spying on. Let there be no mistake about it, the notion that you can be 100% ok with the amount of agencies and securities that have increased since 2001 and also hold a belief in the reduction of taxation is entirely erroneous. Let it also be noted that in any attempt to curb this behavior or increasing security state bubble is met with resistance by those who value their sense of safety over their sense of morality or sensibility. Hell they even used the word Patriot to pass an act of protecting themselves while spying on you; Patriot Act. 

Over the years Patriots have risen, but did you even notice?

We have already gone over Snowden, Manning and Assange, all who have given their freedom for your knowledge of the facts of the government you live under. There are more examples of those who have made a stand for a belief in what is moral and right.

The Burger King Corporation recently set itself into a media firestorm. With the acquisition of a foreign (Canada) company, the BK Corp saw to move its Headquarters to Canada to escape higher corporate taxation. Now the media and those unknowingly ignorant of economic sense call this move unpatriotic. But how so? Wasn't the Boston Tea Party a patriotic act, in the same sense to avoid undue taxation, the hypocrisy is almost deafening. 

Cliven Bundy did his patriotic duty in his defiance of federal officials to turn over parts of his land to federal department control in the name of bogus claims of conservation of a certain species. He, along with other resistors in name and spirit spent days holding off Federal Department of Land Management officers as they took to try and take what they wanted of property that had no right to.


So on this Patriots day let's remember those that gave their lives, their freedoms and their blood, sweat and tears for what is morally right, what can be more patriotic than a man who fights a tyrannous, overbearing, overreaching, overburdening Government? 

Never Forget: Your government sets its means to kill you, capture you, and steal from you. 
Rise up Patriots! 
  












Monday, September 8, 2014

Someone is leaking NSA and Gov docs, but it isn't Snowden.




https://thepatriotpapers.wordpress.com/2014/09/08/new-post-snowden-leaks-reveal-secret-details-of-u-s-terrorist-watch-list/

The US Government is trying to find the source of multiple leaks of intelligence data. Dated and drafted after Edward Snowden was removed from clearance multiple data points have been released to journalists around the world. The US government must now consider every intelligence officer and contractor a risk. It is clear that while the US Government tries its best to contain its own transgressions and discretions it would be easier and less costly to the American Citizens wallet if they refrained from performing breaches of privacy around the world. The aftermath of Snowden has left a divide in the opinions of most Americans, some calling him a traitor and others, a hero.

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies" as someone has said in the recent past rings true in this situation.





Image via http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/edward-snowden-580.jpg

Friday, September 5, 2014

Introducing the Mises Curriculum!

The Mises Institute has always promoted scholarship and education in the pursuit of liberty. Ideas have always been at the heart of our mission.
That’s why we decided in 2010 to make world-class instruction in the ideas of liberty only a mouse-click away for people around the world. So we started Mises Academy, the first — and best — Austrian economics online learning platform in the world. Next we added a broader range of liberty-focused courses to the Academy. Since then we’ve delivered dozens of in-depth, high-caliber live courses to thousands of students around the world.
The 50+ courses in the Mises Curriculum at the Mises Institute will guide you through Austrian economics, from the action axiom to advanced monetary theory, and through libertarian political philosophy, from the non-aggression principle to advanced libertarian legal theory. Also included are courses on history, philosophy, and even logic.
Course design and lectures are by the soundest thinkers and the top scholars in the Misesian/Rothbardian tradition: Joseph Salerno, Peter Klein, David Gordon, Robert Murphy, Thomas DiLorenzo, and others. You’ll get the real deal: thoroughly praxeological and completely free-market economics, as well as principled, radical, and uncompromising libertarian theory.
For a mere $99/year, you can get full access to all of these courses, including hours of lectures recorded in both video and audio, hyperlinked syllabi of online readings, professor-written quizzes, certificates of completion, and more. Work through whole courses from start to finish, or fill in gaps in your understanding by zeroing in on particular lectures and lessons from multiple courses.
Ideas Have Consequences
Ludwig von Mises demonstrated that all governments, and the social order itself, depend onideology, which he defined as “the totality of our doctrines concerning individual conduct and social relations,” and which includes both doctrines that concern ends, like political philosophies, and doctrines that concern means, like economic theories. Therefore, it is ultimately ideology that is what gives a state the widespread influence, or “might,” as Mises called it, that it needs to rule.
Thus, contrary to Mao’s famous dictum, political power flows not from the barrel of a gun but from ideas. In fact, Mao’s own rise to power, and that of many like him, was ultimately due in large part to the fact that the idea of a planned society, including its purest form, socialism, had captured the hearts, minds, and imaginations of entire generations, from the mid-nineteenth century onward. Its time had come, however fleetingly, and many regimes that tried to stop the march of socialist ideas with force utterly failed. It was only widespread disenchantment with socialism that halted the march.
Moreover, freedom from political power is also ultimately based on ideas. When the time does come for the ideas of liberty — libertarian political philosophy and sound economics — it won’t be, as The New York Times recently put it, a “libertarian moment.” It will be, as Ron Paul clarified, a “libertarian transition.” And the state, for all its weapons and cages, will be powerless to stop it, because the ideas of liberty are the negation of the ideas upon which the state’s power rests.
It was the ideas of the political philosophers of liberalism and of the laissez-faire economists that were ultimately responsible for the limited flowering of liberty that occurred prior to the rise of the modern managerial state.
And it is the ideas of thinkers like Mises and Murray Rothbard, propagated by institutions like the Mises Institute and individuals like you, which can give moral leaders like Ron Paul the “might” to sway the public to choose liberty. That is the battle of ideas before us.
We have always developed courses with systematic, long-term study in mind, intent on building an archive of courses that constitutes a thorough Austro-libertarian curriculum. And we are now making that treasury of truth-teaching available as one amazing resource: The Mises Curriculum.
If you would like to thoroughly prepare yourself to help us make liberty become the idea whose time has come, I can think of no better way to do it. For more information, and to register, go to Mises.org/Curriculum.

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

What Can They Do To Make You Say "No More"?

What would your government have to do to make you fight back? What would they have to do that caused the population to dissent? What act would one agency have to commit for you to stand up and say “NO, I am not taking this anymore!” Not merely voting to change what is being done but to completely abolish those doing it. Question yourself this.

Distrust in the government is nothing new. It is not a new era thing or even something only the younger generations are starting; in fact dissent to control has been taking place since men formed any sort of governance over others. This dissent has seen every age and every reason. It has lived throughout centuries and all over the globe. It fueled The American Revolution and The Civil War. Dissent can be seen as different actions. Maybe it is just the questioning of government, seeking accountability, exposure of immoral acts perpetrated against innocents. It could be the actual physical actions against the state. Either aggressing against the state or not recognizing the State's self-appropriated power. It could be the act of non-compliance, agorism, or removing one’s self from the situations and going “off the grid”.

But the question is What Would Make Someone to Do This? What could be the final straw for YOU that absolutely break any sincere reverence for the state or its offices and officials? For most this isn't even a question they would attempt to answer. For most, the blind allegiance has been ingrained since birth that compliance is fate and resistance is futile. The “Statists” as they are called, see themselves as the masters of the government power and those officials as employees and representatives to their will. This is clearly not the case in American Politics, but let’s let them keep their fantasy. They seek power over others and to form a moral civilization by force, those morals being their own. In their belief of these powers and representation it may be easier for them to answer “Nothing” to this question at first. But could there be something suppressed in them that would cause them to answer? Could there be a line that cannot be crossed? Can there be that unforgivable event that occurs and is the catalyst to a real level of dissent?

Ask yourself these questions.
Is there anything that the TSA could do to me that would make me say “I am not going to let this continue”?

Is there any amount of spying that the NSA can do to me that I will reject their ability and power to do so? 

How much does the IRS have to take before you say it is too much? How much of a slave are you willing to be?

Is there any place that in the world that the military could start a war that would incense me enough to demand them to cease? Is there any amount of people they could target  that would raise a question in your mind about the morality of what they do?

Is there any amount of regulation or mandates that I am uncomfortable enough with that I will resist or simply not comply? 

When is Enough Enough?
This is a question that everyone should try and answer. Everyone should at least attempt to come up with their last straw, their red line in the sand, their own final event.

Why is this so important a question?

The level of intervention into the personal and business lives of all people is of concern to me. It is not a question of how much, but that there is any interjection of government mandates, regulations, restrictions, licensure, theft, murder, coercion and incarceration in the private affairs of citizens. This question gives your self the very definition of what you are willing to put up with, what you will subscribe to, what you will allow to happen, before you finally realize the intrusion into your freedom, the violation of your natural liberty.
So now I leave it to you to answer this for yourself. These answers will be different for everyone.

Is there anything that would make you resist the control of the state?
Is there anything they can do to you that you would fight back?

Is there anything that any department can do to you that you will say “NO”?

Follow me on Twitter @PatriotPapers
Find me on Liberty.me @TheBeardedLibertyGuy
Like the Jefferson Papers Facebook Page

Friday, April 4, 2014

Florida Liberty Summit - Jack Hunter.

Florida Liberty Summit

Jack Hunter, known to some as The Southern Avenger, gave a speech breaking down CPAC 2014 and talking about his views on what he calls The Future of Liberty – Part 1.

At CPAC Mike Huckabee gave a statement that the Republican Party is increasingly becoming more Libertarian, and Mr. Hunter says, “Thank God for that!”

Giving notes on The Goldwater Era alongside the Reagan Era, the Philosophy of the Bush Dynasty.
On Goldwater, Jack states there is a thought that America was not ready for the hard hitting and extremely deep cutting ideas of Barry Goldwater in 1965. I would absolutely agree on this fact.

“Those Damn Goldwater people are everywhere.”

Jack is a dedicated supporter of Libertarian ideals and of Ron Paul, the figurative mast head of the liberty and libertarian movement. He gives an idea that as Libertarianism, the philosophy not the party, the more the establishment Republican Party has to fear.


“The old guard of the Republican Party is clueless to the rising of Libertarians.”

Thursday, March 27, 2014

NSA Reforms

The Obama administration stated in January 2014 that the National Security Agency would be getting reforms to protect citizens from the bulk collection of information. The President announced he wanted to end intelligence gathering practices that involved the government storing broad collections of phone and electronic communication data.

Recently Senator Diane Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee accused the CIA of hacking the committee’s computers in a move to silence their opposition to a practice of torture by the CIA. Senator Feinstein was of course dismayed that her personal information could have been at risk for snooping by Federal Officials completely ignoring the fact that the CIA and NSA continue this practice on the citizenry of this country on a daily he underlying issue with the Senator’s argument is, “It is ok to spy on them, but wrong to spy on us.” That is a dangerous notion indeed.

In a bipartisan move Reps. Mike Rogers  and Dutch Ruppersberger , the chairman and ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee respectively , said, “the End Bulk Collection Act will ensure the federal government doesn’t retain logs about calls made within the United States. The bill would also ban bulk collection of “electronic communications records” Still allowed under this act is the ability for telephone and cellular phone companies to continue to collect the info, but the federal government would have to request the info from them. This is similar to the FISA 1978 and its secret court system for which the NSA acquired their power to spy on American citizens without their knowledge. In the end your information is still being collected and it can still be obtained by the federal and state governments, this bill is simply sugar to soothe the wounds instead of salt.

The NSA and its information and intelligence collection has come under fire since the most popular whistle blower in history, Edward Snowden, released confidential and top secret information to these programs. Though Snowden wasn’t the first to reveal the details of mass surveillance by the United States Government, that honor belongs to Russ Tice who had in December of 2005 alleged that the NSA was engaged in unlawful and unconstitutional intellegience gathering on the American people via clandestine eavesdropping programs outside the ordinances of FISA and it's secret court.

Former President Jimmy Carter has said recently that he hand writes letters to foreign and domestic leaders because of his fear of the NSA’s power. Now that is ironic since it was under Jimmy Carter that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 was drafted and signed giving the CIA and NSA the power to collect all information from all sources on anyone in the world. The monster he unleashed has grown too large and now even he doesn’t feel safe, so why would anyone else?
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul is taking a bit of credit for the recent progress on this matter saying, “I don’t want to take all the credit for ending this, but I think our lawsuit had something to do with bringing the president to the table.”
Paul continues to say that he would still like to see a investigation of the abuse of power by the CIA and NSA saying, “. I favor a select committee like they had in the 1970s, the Church Committee, to look into all of these. There is a certain amount of arrogance here that needs to be checked.”


I wrote previously on the abuses and institutions of the surveillance here and here and I would direct all those interested in the actions and effects of FISA, The Patriot Act and the NSA’s use of intelligence gathering around the world to read Glenn Greenwald’s book  How Would A Patriot Act?